Current Paediatrics
Volume 12, Issue 6 , Pages 503-507, December 2002

Informed consent for neonatal research

Peter Congdon Neonatal Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS2 9NS, UK

Abstract 

Research is the cornerstone of progress in medicine. Neonatal research, both basic science and the randomized controlled trial (RCT) have demonstrated the positive and negative aspects of new treatments. The RCT is recognized as the gold standard for determining the effectiveness of new treatments. Informed consent is central to any research taking place but in neonatal research this presents a number of problems.

By the nature of the subjects, the consent is ‘proxy consent’. In addition, the timing of the consent is often shortly after birth and/or at times of severe emotional distress. Recent research has shown that the quality of the informed consent falls below the requirements expected of it. This appears greatest for research where consent is required urgently and/or the study is considered to have significant risks. Whilst the research ethics committee places great store on the value of the parent information leaflet, parents appear to rely more on the communication by the doctor obtaining the informed consent in their decision making.

Improvements to the obtaining and validity of informed consent for neonatal research are possible through improved understanding of the role of all those involved. The meeting with parent(s) to obtain informed consent should be viewed as the first stage of continual involvement of parents and their baby(s) in a research project.

Keywords: informed consent, competence, understanding, information, voluntariness

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  • f1 Correspondence to: ABG. Tel.: 0113 3922936; Fax: 0113 3926068; E-mail: bryan.gill@leedsth.nhs.uk

PII: S0957-5839(02)90333-7

doi:10.1054/cupe.2002.0333

Current Paediatrics
Volume 12, Issue 6 , Pages 503-507, December 2002