Current Paediatrics
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 23-29, February 2003

Individual responsibilities in multidisciplinary working

  • R.E Morton

      Affiliations

    • Ronnie MacKeith Child Development Centre, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK
  • ,
  • K Billings

      Affiliations

    • Ronnie MacKeith Child Development Centre, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK
  • ,
  • J Hankinson

      Affiliations

    • Ronnie MacKeith Child Development Centre, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK
  • ,
  • D Hart

      Affiliations

    • Education Psychology Service, Derbyshire County Council, Matlock, Derbyshire, UK
  • ,
  • J Nicholson

      Affiliations

    • Ronnie MacKeith Child Development Centre, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK
  • ,
  • A Rowlands

      Affiliations

    • Umbrella, Parent Group, Ronnie MacKeith Child Development Centre, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK
  • ,
  • R Saunders

      Affiliations

    • Disabled Childrens' Team, Derby City Social Services, Perth Street, Chaddesden, Derby, UK
  • ,
  • A Walter

      Affiliations

    • Ronnie MacKeith Child Development Centre, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK

Article Outline

Abstract 

The assessment and management of the disabled child requires close teamwork from a number of professionals working together in health, along with colleagues from education and social services. This article describes the contribution made by each discipline in our local services. Although details of working vary between different places, the concept of a team utilizing the specific expertise of each member in partnership with parents remains the same.

Keywords: multidisciplinary, multi-agency, assessment, team, disability

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

    REFERENCES
  1. Fit for the Future, 1, London, HMSO, 1976
  2. Bailey G, Hyde L, Morton RE. Sending a copy of the letter to the general practitioner also to the parents in a child development centre: does it work?. Child Care Health Dev. 1996;22:1–9
  3. Russell P, Rosenbaum P, Cadman D, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S. The Gross Motor Function Measure: a means to evaluate the results of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989;31:341–352
  4. Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, et a l. Validation of a mode of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000;80:974–985
  5. Standards of Practice for Paediatric Physiotherapy. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy; 1995;
  6. Nicholson J. A Survey of occupational therapy in child development centres, part 1. NAPOT J. 2001;5–18
  7. National Association of Paediatric Occupational Therapists, Guidelines for Good Practice, NAPOT, 2000, www.cot.org.uk
  8. Hibberd J, Taylor J. The Jay's observational assessment of paediatric dysphagia. Birmingham: Quest Training; 2001;
  9. The Hanen Programme. Ontario: Hanen Centre; 1983;
  10. Special Educational Needs Code of Practice. Annesley: DfES Publications; 2001;
  11. The National Portage Association UK, www.portage.org.uk
  12. Education and the Under Eights: A Guide to the Law. London: National Early Years Network and Advisory Centre for Education; 1997;
  • f1 Correspondence to: REM. Tel.: +44 (0) 1332 340 131; E-mail: joan.palmer@sdah-tr.trent.nhs.uk

PII: S0957-5839(03)90404-0

doi:10.1054/cupe.2003.0404

Current Paediatrics
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 23-29, February 2003