Current Paediatrics
Volume 15, Issue 5 , Pages 390-399, October 2005

Which milk for the sick preterm infant?

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Barts and the London NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB, UK

Summary 

Understanding the nutritional needs of the sick preterm infant will ensure that nutritionally adequate milks are used, but to minimise complications an understanding of the interaction between milk composition and neonatal gastrointestinal physiology is required. Unmodified preterm breast milk is probably the safest milk, but might require supplementation with fortifiers to meet nutritional needs. Fortification affects the osmolarity, protein and mineral content of breast milk in ways that can have adverse effects on intestinal function. Although preterm formulas meet the nutritional requirements of sick preterm infants, formula milk is associated with an increased risk of necrotising enterocolitis. Hydrolysate and elemental formulas have a role in treating established malabsorption, dysmotility or obstruction, but they are nutritionally inadequate for the sick preterm baby and have features which make them unsuitable for the prevention of gastrointestinal disease. In some circumstances, the use of minimal or partial enteral nutrition can help to maintain nutrition in the particularly sick infant, in which case the nutritional content of the milk will be less critical.

Keywords: Infant formula, Infant nutrition, Infant, Premature, Milk, Human, Necrotising enterocolitis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0957-5839(05)00064-3

doi:10.1016/j.cupe.2005.06.005

Current Paediatrics
Volume 15, Issue 5 , Pages 390-399, October 2005